If you want to understand how Mitt Romney made his money and
how he fits among many of the rapacious buyout fund operators you'll need a
little lesson in how such funds take over companies.
A standard approach to taking over a business by a hedge or
buyout fund is to borrow money that is combined with investor money to pay for
the purchase. This immediately adds debt to the company's balance sheet. The
operators of these funds make sure that they borrow enough that they can pay
themselves back almost immediately, replacing what they invested. Frequently a
20% return to investors for these funds is not unusual. So the actual
investment by people who put money into these funds (and the businesses they
bought) becomes much smaller.
When you add to the company's debt burden you have to do
something to make the balance sheet look more attractive. That's done by
getting rid of workers and thinning the company's labor costs. In other words
the investors get money out of the company, while many employees lose their
jobs.
Is this good for companies? Does acquiring a company using
debt that injures the company's balance sheet
provide a way of building a better America? Four out of ten companies
Romney invested in went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Romney built a fortune for
himself.
Wall Street has played with America since the Clinton
administration, making deals that did not add value to the American economy,
but made Financial Ubermensch rich.
To those of you reading this who are unemployed, I'm telling
you it has nothing to do with your ability to work hard and contribute to our
country. You are just a victim of 20 years of economic rape.
No comments:
Post a Comment